New Ideal - Reason | Individualism | Capitalism
Harry Binswanger and Gregory Salmieri on the Rubin Report - Grounding morality in facts

The Rubin Report: Why It Is Critical to Be Fact-Oriented

Recently, we featured in New Ideal the Ayn Rand Institute’s partnership with Dave Rubin to produce a series of Rubin Report interviews exploring Objectivism and its view of happiness. See the episode list below for the first four videos.

Today, we continue the series with a deep dive into the question of why it is critical to be fact-oriented in the pursuit of happiness. In this interview, Rubin sits down with two philosophers — Harry Binswanger, a member of ARI’s board of directors, and Gregory Salmieri, Anthem Foundation fellow and lecturer at Rutgers University — to discuss the relationship between facts and values, and why that issue — which might seem abstract and esoteric — is crucially relevant to the achievement of happiness.

This being Binswanger’s first appearance on the Rubin Report, Rubin took the opportunity to ask him, as someone who knew Ayn Rand well, what she was like as a person, and why the “meme” about Rand and about Objectivists is often negative. Binswanger charmingly recounts some of his experiences interacting personally with Rand — and both Binswanger and Salmieri note that a highly provocative thinker who challenges people’s deepest-held beliefs is bound to provoke strongly charged reactions.

After that introductory discussion, Rubin plunges right into the philosophical deep end by asking about the “Is-Ought” gap. This is the age-old philosophical question of how ideas about what we “ought” to do are related to questions about what “is” — in other words, how values relate to facts.

Binswanger and Salmieri question whether the moral lessons conveyed by Old and New Testament stories of sacrifice really do convey any truth, psychological or otherwise, when the morality of self-sacrifice cannot be derived from facts.
Rand’s philosophy offers a fresh and radical solution to this question. Salmieri notes how Rand draws on her distinctive view of how all concepts are formed on the basis of facts, while Binswanger points to the specific facts about living organisms from which Rand thought value concepts are formed.

Readers may recall that Rubin hosted a panel conversation at last summer’s Objectivist conference that included Salmieri as well as Jordan Peterson. That conversation delved even more deeply into the “is-ought” issue and Rand’s distinctive approach to it.

It also touched on a number of other themes relevant to the current discussion. Referring back to that event, Rubin asks about the connection between morality and stories.

Peterson has argued that religious mythology conveys a kind of psychological truth or significance even when it is not literally true. While acknowledging that religious mythology can be artistically powerful, Binswanger and Salmieri question whether the moral lessons conveyed by Old and New Testament stories of sacrifice really do convey any truth, psychological or otherwise, when the morality of self-sacrifice cannot be derived from facts. Great art that draws on a more rational moral code, on the other hand, can provide inspiration, clarity, and the philosophical perspective needed to overcome obstacles in the pursuit of happiness.

Much of the rest of the conversation centers on the implications and importance of a philosophical commitment to the facts of reality:

  • Does the exploration of and adherence to a philosophy like Objectivism amount to the dogmatic embrace of something like a religion, or does it give one tools for being intellectually honest?
  • Does such a philosophy wall itself off from science, or does it welcome new scientific discoveries and work to integrate them into its principles?
  • Does scientific progress occur more or less automatically in the absence of government interference, or does such progress itself have to be achieved through the development of a fact-oriented methodology?
  • Does the ubiquity of social media technology present us with unavoidable distractions from the facts of reality, or can we devise a proper method of using it that enables us to know more about the world?

After a wide-ranging intellectual discussion with a focus on the rigorous development of standards of morality and science, it is refreshing that the conversation ends with Rubin’s pointed question, “Where does fun fit into this?” To find out whether Binswanger and Salmieri are any fun, and whether they think this is what counts in a life lived in the pursuit of happiness, watch the video until the end!

Audio podcasts of this episode are available on iTunes and Stitcher.


Objectivism on Happiness (Rubin Report episode list):

Objectivism on Happiness – Episode list

To explore this topic further check out “David Hume: Causality, the Problem of Induction, and the Subjectivity of Ethics” on ARI Campus.

Share this article:

Share this article:

Ben Bayer

Ben Bayer, PhD in philosophy and formerly a professor, is a fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute. Ben is an associate editor of New Ideal.

Keith Lockitch

Keith Lockitch, PhD in physics, is a senior fellow and vice president of education at the Ayn Rand Institute. He focuses primarily on the intersection of science with current events and policy issues. He is a senior editor of New Ideal.

Updates from New Ideal

 

Listen to New Ideal Live!

New Ideal Live is the podcast that explores pressing cultural issues from the perspective of Ayn Rand’s philosophy, Objectivism, which upholds the ideals of reason, individualism, and capitalism.

Subscribe here.

Ayn Rand University App

Explore unique philosophical content that challenges conventional views — in courses you can take on the go.

Available on Google Play and
the App Store.