facebook pixel
New Ideal - Reason | Individualism | Capitalism
The Supreme Court Abortion Leak vs. the Rule of Law

The Supreme Court Abortion Leak vs. the Rule of Law

In this episode of New Ideal Live, Onkar Ghate and Ben Bayer discuss the leak of an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that appears to be the draft of a majority Supreme Court decision in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade, and they examine both the draft decision itself and the significance of its release.

Among the topics covered:

  • An overview of the case and the leak of the draft opinion;
  • The harmful consequences of the leak on the Court’s ability to rationally deliberate;
  • Why it’s important to comment on the leaked draft despite its harmful effects;
  • The essence of Alito’s argument, and how it compares to typical arguments that the Constitution does not protect abortion rights;
  • Why Alito’s argument is wrong to imply that the Constitution’s enumeration of rights offers no guidance to determining unenumerated rights;
  • Why Alito is wrong to treat tradition as a source of guidance in legal interpretation;
  • How Alito’s dismissal of Supreme Court precedents about personal liberty reveals an  unstated religious viewpoint;
  • How Oliver Wendell Holmes’s Lochner dissent, which argued that the Constitution does not protect a wide-ranging right to liberty, influenced both Roe and Alito’s draft;
  • Why Alito’s argument that most liberties should be subject to the decisions of voters implies opposition to the rule of law;
  • Today’s un-American conception of the rule of law as pertaining only to process, not to a substantive protection of individual rights;
  • Why government has the burden of proof to show that its actions are delegated powers, and citizens should not have to show that it violates their rights;
  • Why the idea that the Constitution constrains only the federal government, not the states, is un-American;
  • Why some rights are enumerated in the Constitution;
  • The consequences of leaving the issue of abortion up to Congress and state legislatures.

Mentioned in this podcast are the Ayn Rand Lexicon entry  “Abortion,” the New Ideal Live episode “Roe v. Wade on the Brink,” Bayer’s article “Abortion Should Be Legal Until Birth,” and Tom Bowden’s article “Justice Holmes and the Empty Constitution.”

The podcast was recorded on May 4, 2022. Listen to the discussion below. Listen and subscribe from your mobile device on Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcasts, Spotify or Stitcher. Watch archived podcasts here.

Podcast audio:

SUPPORT ARI

If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Do you have a comment or question?

Share this article:

Sam Weaver

Sam Weaver, BA in English, is an associate fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute and a recipient of the Conceptual Education Fellowship.

Updates from New Ideal

Book Image  

Listen to New Ideal Live!

New Ideal Live is the podcast that explores pressing cultural issues from the perspective of Ayn Rand’s philosophy, Objectivism, which upholds the ideals of reason, individualism, and capitalism.

Subscribe here.

Ayn Rand University App

Explore unique philosophical content that challenges conventional views — in courses you can take on the go.

Available on Google Play and
the App Store.

Welcome to New Ideal!

If you like what you’re reading, be sure to subscribe to our weekly newsletter! You’ll also receive a FREE copy of our book, Illuminating Ayn Rand.