New Ideal - Reason | Individualism | Capitalism
wearing mask in public

Is It Selfish to Never Wear a Mask?

What should we think of people who flatly refuse to wear masks in any situation? Some pundits give an unequivocal answer: “Failure to wear a mask [is] an incredibly selfish act that puts other people’s lives at risk.” “Being against masks is a selfish personal choice that impacts others.” One even describes skeptical attitudes about masks (including President Trump’s) as a sign of a broader “cult of selfishness.”

Is stubbornly refusing to wear a mask really “selfish”? That depends on what you mean by the term.

The conventional view is that selfishness means doing whatever you feel like, regardless of its effects on others. By that standard, people would be considered selfish if they don’t want to wear a mask because it’s uncomfortable or inconvenient, even though it can save the lives of other valued people.

But if selfishness also means the dedicated pursuit of one’s self-interest, how does a disregard for others help in this pursuit? It doesn’t.

A world full of sick and dying people is not to anyone’s advantage.
Other people’s lives contribute immensely to one’s own self-interest. A world full of sick and dying people is not to anyone’s advantage. Anyone who misses the life we all lost in March is already familiar with this. Whether you’ve lost a job or are grieving for a loved one, or even just miss being able to go to a restaurant with friends, you know other people matter to your interests. They are the potential employers, producers, innovators, and friends who help each of us live a happy human life. So why would you want to slow the return to normal life with people by getting them sick?

There is also the obvious short-term benefit of the social effect of good will. I want other people to wear masks so that I won’t get infected. One way to signal this to them is by wearing a mask myself as a gesture of respect. It communicates “I’ll protect you if you’ll protect me.” Gestures of respect generally open our lives to the good things others offer. As someone concerned with his self-interest, this is the kind of “virtue signaling” I’m happy to do.

If you don’t care about how others affect your own interests, do you really care about your self-interest? The broader point is that pursuing self-interest isn’t just doing whatever you feel like. I never feel like wearing a mask: they are uncomfortable, inconvenient, and ugly. But not liking them doesn’t mean they’re not good for me. I almost always feel like eating donuts, but I know that wouldn’t be good for my health. By the same token, inconvenient masks may still be good for my health.

READ ALSO:  The Dangerous Thinking Behind Pandemic Partisanship
Someone who really cares about pursuing his or her self-interest will look carefully at the evidence about the effects of diet — or masks — on one’s health.  As it happens, there’s mounting evidence that wearing a mask protects not just others but also oneself. A recent meta-analysis of 172 observational studies of Covid and similar respiratory infections suggests that even simple surgical masks lower the chances of getting infected compared to wearing nothing.1 There’s also some evidence that those wearing a mask who still get infected are more likely only to have asymptomatic cases that induce immunity (because masks reduce the viral load).2

 

This latest evidence is far from conclusive. But there is very conclusive evidence that Covid is very dangerous (with a significantly higher fatality rate than the seasonal flu).3 So when you compare the minor inconvenience of wearing a mask to the chance of guarding against the (admittedly unlikely) prospect of a terrible outcome, isn’t it a rational bet to wear a mask at least in the riskiest situations — like a form of insurance?

There’s no justification for government mandates about masks: private institutions should be the ones to decide about the rules for entering their premises, which we are then free to enter or not. A government dedicated to the protection of individual rights should play a role in combatting the pandemic by testing, tracing, and isolating infected people (there should be no mandatory lockdowns). But the reason to leave individuals free to choose is to allow them to think rationally about what choice to make.

Rand rejected the common view that being selfish means doing whatever you feel like regardless of its effects on others. What achieving your own selfish interests fundamentally requires is love for the truth.
This isn’t just theoretical for me. I consider myself dedicated to the pursuit of my own self-interest. So for all of the reasons sketched above, I make a point to wear a mask in limited, appropriate situations. This includes when I’m interacting with people at greater risk from the virus, and when I’m interacting with larger numbers people I don’t know very well. Thinking rationally about my interests demands attention to the greater risks to one’s own values in such situations.

There are some who wear masks in situations where there is no clear risk to protect against, like when they are outside exercising all by themselves, or even on Zoom calls. If they do this only because they think it’s expected of them, this is the flip side of the same error as the people who refuse to ever wear masks simply because they want to defy other people. Neither of them is thinking rationally about their own interests, independently of what others expect.

Ayn Rand, who famously defended “the virtue of selfishness,” had this to say about the importance of thinking rationally: “Reason is the most selfish human faculty: . . . its product — truth — makes [one] inflexible, intransigent, impervious to the power of any pack or any ruler.”

This is why Rand rejected the common view that being selfish means doing whatever you feel like regardless of its effects on others. What achieving your own selfish interests fundamentally requires is love for the truth.

Not everyone cares about the truth, or about their own best interests. If only there were a mask we could wear to protect ourselves from all of the other ways their destructive behavior affects our lives.

A version of this article was originally published by the Southern California News Group.

SUPPORT ARI

If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Footnotes

  1. Derek Chu et al., “Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet, 395 (June 27, 2020): 1973–87.
  2. Monica Gandhi, et al., “Masks Do More Than Protect Others During COVID-19: Reducing the Inoculum of SARS-CoV-2 to Protect the Wearer,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35 (July 31, 2020): 3063-66.
  3. “Listicle of ‘facts’ about COVID-19 contains numerous inaccurate and misleading claims,” HealthFeedback.org, August 26, 2020.
Share this article:
Avatar

Ben Bayer

Ben Bayer, Ph.D. in philosophy and formerly a professor, is a fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute. Ben is an associate editor of New Ideal.

Updates from New Ideal

 

Listen to New Ideal Live!

New Ideal Live is the podcast that explores pressing cultural issues from the perspective of Ayn Rand’s philosophy, Objectivism, which upholds the ideals of reason, individualism, and capitalism.

Subscribe here.

Ayn Rand University App

Explore unique philosophical content that challenges conventional views — in courses you can take on the go.

Available on Google Play and
the App Store.